top of page

Future of Government 2030+:​

A Speculative design project looking at how to increase citizen participation in local policymaking

Project Type: Service Design, Research through Design, Future Thinking

Organisation: LCC, European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) in collaboration with DG CONNECT and Camden Council

 

My Role: Service Designer together with Tracy Gordon, Clara Llamas, Tianyuan Wei
 

Timeline: March – May 2018

Our challenge was to explore how democracy could become more democratic and citizen-centred in the future. The European Commission wanted to understand the evolving relationships between citizens, businesses, and governments.

Our team focused on Future Models for Open Democracy, asking:

​

  • How can citizens move beyond passive voting to active participation?

  • How might technology enable inclusive, transparent policymaking?

  • ​

We concluded that future democracy should empower citizens to co-create policies that impact their lives and communities.

7a88697d-f675-42a1-8b2e-df57b009b134_rw_1920.jpg

Outcome

​

Our final deliverables consisted of two key elements:

​​
 

1. Paid Citizen Policy Act 2030+A provocation and proposal for increasing citizen participation in local policymaking, including:A stipend for citizens in exchange for policy participationEducation on participation embedded in primary school curriculumSense-making technologies to enrich debate with real-time insights

2798f64f-7907-424e-a51c-c363185addaf_rw_

2. Art InstallationA physical provocation representing the semantic relationship between people (red), policy (blue), and data (turquoise). The installation envisioned a citizen-led future, where citizens, policy, and data coexist in a shared ecosystem, shaping decisions collaboratively and transparently.

Process: Research Through Design
 

We framed our work around a provocative “What if?” question:


“What if we rewarded citizens for their service as policymakers as motivation for their contributions to open democracy?”

​

Experiment 1: Emotional and Semantic Data in Debates
 

We tested citizen-led debates using bracelets to collect emotional data and microphones to capture semantic data. The goal was to explore whether visualising emotions could enrich discussions.

​

Key finding: Participants were sceptical about emotional data collection, citing ethical concerns and potential manipulation. However, they strongly supported greater citizen involvement in policymaking.

​​

ace69341-c4c1-4a19-a4c1-c7a430fed45f_rw_1920.png

​Experiment 2: Remote Citizen-Led Discussions
 

We simulated a policy discussion on housing in Camden, involving clusters of experts and citizens. A sense-making AI visualised contributions and integrated relevant insights from other councils and EU contexts.

​

Key finding: Participants liked the idea of remote participation and using AI to enrich debates. However, the term “AI” carried negative connotations and participants felt observed rather than supported.

ec0df3a9-e1b6-41ff-935b-707d826915a8_rw_1920.jpeg

Prototyping & Iterations

​

Building on these insights, we prototyped future citizen-led policymaking systems:
 

  • Started with sketches

  • Progressed to 3D cardboard models

  • Finalised with plexiglass installations representing the interplay of citizens, policy, and data
     

These prototypes served as provocations, sparking dialogue on the ethics, feasibility, and desirability of participatory democracy models.

Artboard 2_3.png

My role

 

 

I worked collaboratively across all stages, focusing on:
 

  • Research through design: Planning and running experiments, synthesising findings
     

  • Prototyping: Creating physical models to represent abstract concepts like policy and participation
     

  • Documentation: Maintaining a blog to share insights and reflections on future trends in democracy
     

  • Representation: Presenting our proposal, Paid Citizen Policy Act 2030+, at the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre in Brussels to stakeholders and academic partners

​

​This project deepened my ability to translate abstract systemic challenges into tangible design provocations and communicate them effectively to diverse audiences.

Key Learnings

​

  • Prototyping as research: Involving people in early-stage experiments is an effective way to validate or challenge assumptions
     

  • Feedback integration: I learned how to analyse and incorporate user feedback into iterative prototypes
     

  • Future thinking as a design tool: Using speculative design to provoke new ways of thinking in large institutions
     

  • Materialising the abstract: Developed skills in turning intangible concepts like policy and governance into physical artefacts
     

  • Democracy insights: Gained a deeper understanding of how democracy functions in the UK and EU, and emerging trends shaping its future

IMG_0292.HEIC

Reflection
 

This project reinforced the power of design as a catalyst for systemic change. By combining future thinking, research through design, and participatory methods, we created artefacts that challenged assumptions and opened conversations about citizen-led governance. While speculative, the work highlighted real opportunities for inclusive, transparent policymaking, and the ethical considerations that come with integrating technology into democratic processes

bottom of page